Linda's Literary Home

Tag: fiction

  • D. H. Lawrence’s Novel “Women in Love”

    D. H. Lawrence 1280 Transcend
    Image: D. H. Lawrence – Transcend Media Service

    D. H. Lawrence’s Novel Women in Love

    D. H. Lawrence’s Women in Love offers a study of the 20th-century issue of the divided nature of the human mind.  The flawed characters of Rupert and Ursula reveal an unsolvable problem that continues to plague the conscience of humanity, as it struggles for proper behavior.

    Lawrentian Irony

    D. H. Lawrence’s novel Women in Love has remained the novelist’s most complex yet subtle works.  A superficial reading seems to reveal that the two main characters, Rupert Birkin and Ursula Brangwen, are moving toward Lawrence’s notion of the ideal love, that is, unity in love.  

    On the contrary, however, is the fact that the couple’s unsatisfactory marriage highlights the Lawrentian irony that promotes the satire in which the novelist has steeped his most complex novel.

    The Symbol of Fidelity

    In A Reader’s Guide to D. H. Lawrence, Philip Hobsbaum points out that the opal ring that Rupert gives to Ursula symbolizes fidelity.  Of the trio of rings Rupert casually hands Ursula—a sapphire and a topaz as well as the opal—only the opal fits her ring finger.  

    Lawrence’s use of the opal indicates irony; a literal interpretation of the meaning of the opal would render the novel a simplistic story with a happy ending.  A close analysis of the characters in this work and of Lawrence’s idea of modern man’s divided nature reveals that this novel is a highly complex satire of that divided nature.

    Both Hobsbaum and Richard Aldington have applauded Lawrence’s genius for satire as it is demonstrated in Women in Love.  According to Lawrence’s own ethic expounded in Psychoanalysis and the Unconscious, “the goal in life is the coming to perfection of each single individual” (100).  

    Lawrence further explains that “recognition of the abysmal other” and “the twofold passionate flux of sympathetic love, subjective abdominal and objective devotional” must balance and be equally accepted by the individual.  Individuals must achieve this equilibrium before they can experience an ideal relationship.

    The Lawrentian Balance

    According to his ideas of equilibrium, Lawrence creates the characters of his novels who thus satirize the imbalance in modern man and woman.  Ursula, at the point in the novel that she is fitted with the ring symbolizing fidelity, has not achieved the Lawrentian balance.  And neither has the character, Rupert, who is about to become her lover.  Both Rupert and Ursula have a void in their lives—a void that they never know how to fill.  

    Ursula’s former lover Skrebensky, whom readers met in The Rainbow, was unable to fill the void for her, and Rupert’s relationship with Hermione has left him empty as well.  Because these characters are not perfected as individuals, they bring their imperfections to their relationships with their lovers.

    That the ring fitting Ursula’s ring finger symbolizes fidelity highlights the irony of their situations.  Neither character—Rupert who gives the ring, nor Ursula whom it fits—is capable of fidelity because they are still unfaithful to their own true nature, the unified nature that knows how to recognize and accept that “abysmal other.”  

    These characters exemplify modern man and woman who have not reached the Lawrentian perfection, whose failure to recognize that they have divided their psyches “has torn the modern world into two halves, the one half warring for the voluntary, objective, separatist control, the other for the pure sympathetic” (100).

    Appearances

    The fact that Rupert and Ursula do marry and verbally declare fidelity effects the situation against which the irony is directed.  Ostensibly, the couple strives to unite, but at the deep personal level where unity ultimately prevails, they remain divided.  According to F. H. Langman, 

    The tale, if we can trust it, simply does not present the marriage of Birkin and Ursula as ideal in itself or as an adequate solution to the problems presented.  On the contrary, an important thesis of the novel is that no fully satisfying personal relationship is possible to people placed, like Birkin and Ursula, in a social and religious vacuum.  (81-82)

    Lawrence emphasizes repeatedly in his Psychoanalysis and the Unconscious: “No human being can develop save through the polarized connection with other beings” (108).  His character Rupert Birkin insists that he cannot feel complete without a deep bond of love with a man as well as with a woman.  

    It is Rupert’s failure to come to terms with his sexual orientation that underscores his split psyche, and his marriage to Ursula cannot serve to weld it.  In his original opening chapter to Women in Love called “A Prologue,” Lawrence explicitly elucidates Rupert’s affinities: 

    He wanted to be in love with a woman.  He wanted all the while to feel this kindled, loving attraction towards a beautiful woman, that he would often feel toward a handsome man.  But he could not.  Whenever it was a case of a woman, there entered in too much spiritual, sisterly love; or else, in reaction, there was only a bestial, callous sort of lust.  (58)

    Lawrence delineates Rupert’s sexual orientation quite clearly in his rejected draft and the impact of Rupert’s repressing that nature becomes the focus, however covert, in the published version.  

    According to George H. Ford, Lawrence decided against the explicit portrayal of Rupert’s same-sex attraction because he feared censorship.  He had just been through the ordeal of censorship with The Rainbow and could not afford it again so soon (39-40).  

    Split Psyche

    Ursula does not relieve Rupert’s burden of a split psyche; she cannot even understand him.  Their violent disagreements continue throughout their relationship.  On occasions, she merely acquiesces to his wishes; an example of this acquiescence is the “Chair” episode.  They purchase an old chair and Rupert declaims against materialism.

    The couple then bickers about the merits of Jane Austen’s England and their own, and finally, for what seems an unmotivated capitulation, Ursula just gives in and says she agrees that they need no possessions, and thus she donates the chair to a young, scruffy-looking city couple whom Lawrence describes as a couple also falling far from his ideal of balance and perfection in love.  

    Lawrence tells readers in his rejected chapter that Rupert is divided against himself:  “he kept this secret [‘his spasmodic affinity for the men he saw’] even from himself” (61).  Because he cannot even bring his feelings before his own scrutiny, he has little hope of making the Lawrentian connection with Ursula—a connection which only balanced beings can achieve.

    Infidelity to Self

    As Langman writes, “The most painful question in the whole novel, a question that precisely reveals the limited value of the experiment in marriage, is Ursula’s question:  ‘why aren’t I enough?’”  (86)  Ursula claims that Rupert is enough for her, and because she feels this way, she cannot come to terms with Rupert’s inclinations.  Rupert has learned to repress his nature, but according to Lawrence, that kind of repression goes against the self—it represents infidelity to the self (Psych. 108).  

    Rupert and Ursula’s relationship, therefore, is not the nourishing meeting of souls that they at times during their affair have claimed it to be.  The opal ring serves as an important device for satirizing that relationship.  The irony that Ursula’s ring finger fits the symbol of fidelity foreshadows the marriage which solves no problems, but, in the words of George H. Ford, “the possibility is left, as in the best of Lawrence’s writings, dangling” (41).

    At the end of the couple’s final conversation, readers observe that they are indeed left only with a possibility.  Rupert and Ursula are still not united but still struggling with conflicting attitudes.  The death of Gerald has left Rupert without a man to love; he says:  “I wanted eternal union with a man too:  another kind of love.”  Ursula counters:  “I don’t believe it.  It’s an obstinacy, a theory, a perversity.” 

    Ursula then continues:  “You can’t have two kinds of love.  Why should you!”  And Rupert responds:  “It seems as if I can’t.  Yet I wanted it.”  And Rupert’s and the novel’s final words are:  “‘I don’t believe that,’ he answered.”  Whether this couple ever finds that Lawrentian ideal of perfection no doubt remains a possibility, but the satire remains intact.  The opal ring, symbol of fidelity, fits Ursula’s finger, but the fidelity between the partners remains illusive.

    A slightly abbreviated version of this article first appeared in The Explicator, Volume 46, Number 2, Winter 1988.

    Works Cited

    Aldington, Richard.  Introduction.  Women in Love.  By D. H. Lawrence.  New York:  Viking P, 1960.  ix-xii. Print.

    Ford, George H.  “Notes to Lawrence’s Prologue to Women in Love.”  The Rainbow and Women in Love: A Casebook.  Ed. Colin Clarke.  London: Macmillan, 1969.  35-42. Print.

    Hobsbaum, Philip.  A Reader’s Guide to D. H. Lawrence.  New York:  Thames and Hudson, 1981. Print.

    Langman, F. H.  “Women in Love.”  Critics on D. H. Lawrence:  Readings in Literary Criticism.  Ed. W. T. Andrews.  81-87. Print.

    Lawrence, D. H.  “Prologue to Women in Love.”  The Rainbow and Women in Love: A Casebook.  Ed. Colin Clarke.  London: Macmillan, 1969.  43-64. Print.

    Image: Book cover Women in Love from my personal library

  • Emily Dickinson’s “Sleep is supposed to be”

    Image: Emily Dickinson – Amherst College – Daguerrotype of the poet at age 17, circa 1847 – likely the only authentic, extant likeness of the poet

    Emily Dickinson’s “Sleep is supposed to be”

    Dickinson’s “Sleep is supposed to be” redefines two common terms employed daily but, to the speaker’s mind, remain misidentified.

    Introduction with Text of  “Sleep is supposed to be”

    While the speaker in “The morns are meeker than they were” offers a playful riddle in order to elaborate on the beauty of the fall season, the speaker of “Sleep is supposed to be” has a very different purpose; this speaker disputes the common conception of “sleep” and “morning.”  

    The speaker then offers the common notion about what sleep and morning are understood to be and contrasts it with a different level of awakening.  She is referring to the spiritual awakening, when the soul and the Oversoul become one.   Dickinson often describes those states of awareness that transcend the physical level of existence.

    Sleep is supposed to be

    Sleep is supposed to be
    By souls of sanity
    The shutting of the eye.

    Sleep is the station grand
    Down which, on either hand
    The hosts of witness stand!

    Morn is supposed to be
    By people of degree
    The breaking of the day.

    Morning has not occurred!

    That shall Aurora be –
    East of Eternity –
    One with the banner gay –
    One in the red array –
    That is the break of Day.

    Reading of “Sleep is supposed to be”   

    Commentary on “Sleep is supposed to be”

    The speaker wants to redefine a term that by her reasoning has been mischaracterized.

    First Stanza:  Normal Sleep

    Sleep is supposed to be
    By souls of sanity
    The shutting of the eye.

    The speaker begins by stating that normally folks think of sleep as the act when people shut their eyes.    Those normal people are just everyday folk who go about their day waking, eating, working, playing, procreating, and of course shutting their eyes to sleep, before the next day finds them doing those ordinary things again.  

    Those individuals are the “sane” souls because they all agree on the common definition of “sleep.”  For them there is no other definition of “sleep”; thus the speaker must now enlighten them.  

    Second Stanza:  Opening Up a Mystic Paradise

    Sleep is the station grand
    Down which, on either hand
    The hosts of witness stand!

    After asserting that the normal, sane folks of the world have defined “sleep” a certain way, the speaker must now insert a new definition into the lexicon of society’s manners and language.   Instead of being merely a “shutting of the eye,” this speaker has discovered that sleep also allows a new world to emerge—one that is “grand.”  

    This world is a mystic paradise, where the angels appear everywhere.  They appear as “hosts” who give witness that this seemingly unusual realm exists.  The speaker has thus elevated the common activity in which all creatures worldwide engage to a metaphysical activity that she can be sure very few have experienced.

    The speaker therefore likely knows that what she is reporting will be understood by very few folks, but by dramatizing it in a poem she may reach some on some intuitive level. And even if they think she is merely describing dreams, well, that is better than continuing to devalue sleep as merely “shutting of the eye.”

    Third Stanza:  Considering Morning

    Morn is supposed to be
    By people of degree
    The breaking of the day.

    The speaker now moves on to the second term which she is urged to redefine for humanity—”Morn” or morning.  As with “sleep,” she tells her readers/listeners what people who deem themselves knowledgeable consider “morn” to be.   Those illustrious but limited folks consider morning to be merely the time that day begins, that time between the “shutting of the eye” and the “breaking of the day .”

    Fourth Stanza:  Morning Every Morning

    Morning has not occurred!

    The speaker then startles her readers/listeners by boldly asserting with emphasis, placing her announcement in one line, in order to draw maximum attention to its content.  

    This speaker insists that, in fact, there has been no “Morning” yet.  Despite the thinking of those smart people that morning is simply the time that day breaks, she courageously declares that “Morning has not occurred!”  Such a startling statement throws open all the windows of the mind.  What could the speaker be thinking?  After all morning occurs every morning, does it not?

    Fifth Stanza:   The True Morning

    That shall Aurora be –
    East of Eternity –
    One with the banner gay –
    One in the red array –
    That is the break of Day.

    The speaker then describes what a true “Morning” is.  A true morning is the time that the souls greets their Maker.  A great light appears that spreads from the forehead (“East”) out into that Heaven beyond the physical cosmos.  

    That union of soul and Oversoul is a time that is marked by a brilliant flag, marked by spreading of the brightest light beyond all physical light and sight.

    The speaker then concludes:  “That is the break of Day.” (Or “That is the break of Day.”) She emphasizes her description by emphasizing the word, “That.”  Modern-day type-script uses italics; Dickinson underlined the word, as is necessary without modern-day technological advances with the use of word processing.

  • Elizabeth Barrett Browning’s Sonnet 36 “When we met first and loved, I did not build”

    Image: Elizabeth Barrett Browning and Robert Browning – 1852. Portraits painted by Thomas Buchanan Read

    Elizabeth Barrett Browning’s Sonnet 36 “When we met first and loved, I did not build”

    In sonnet 36 “When we met first and loved,” the speaker reveals her inability to fully accept the love relationship that is growing with her belovèd suitor.  She is constantly trying to prevent her heart from being broken, in case the relationship fails to reach it full potential.

    Introduction and Text of Sonnet 36 “When we met first and loved, I did not build”

    Elizabeth Barrett Browning’s sonnet 36 “When we met first and loved, I did not build”  from Sonnets from the Portuguese reveals the speaker’s apprehension that the first moments of a new love might prove to be illusive; thus, she refuses to believe unwaveringly in the possibility that love had arrived.

    This speaker always remains aware that she must protect her heart from disaster.  And at this point in their relationship, she knows that she could suffer a terrible broken heart if the relationship fails to flourish.

    Sonnet 36 “When we met first and loved, I did not build”

    When we met first and loved, I did not build
    Upon the event with marble. Could it mean
    To last, a love set pendulous between
    Sorrow and sorrow? Nay, I rather thrilled,
    Distrusting every light that seemed to gild
    The onward path, and feared to overlean
    A finger even. And, though I have grown serene
    And strong since then, I think that God has willed
    A still renewable fear … O love, O troth …
    Lest these enclaspèd hands should never hold,
    This mutual kiss drop down between us both
    As an unowned thing, once the lips being cold.
    And Love, be false! if he, to keep one oath,
    Must lose one joy, by his life’s star foretold.

    Commentary on Sonnet 36 “When we met first and loved, I did not build”

    The speaker again is demonstrating her inability to fully accept the love relationship that is growing with her belovèd suitor.  The speaker must protect her poor heart, which could so easily be shattered if the love relationship should end.

    First Quatrain:  Love between Sorrow

    When we met first and loved, I did not build
    Upon the event with marble. Could it mean
    To last, a love set pendulous between
    Sorrow and sorrow? Nay, I rather thrilled,

    The speaker says that when she and her belovèd first met and love began to flower, she did not readily accept that the feelings were genuine; she refused to imagine that such a relationship could become solid.  She must continue to guard her heart by holding in abeyance only the possibility of a lasting love relationship.

    She questions whether love could endure for her because of the many sorrows she has experienced.  She, instead, continued to think of only the potential of love, existing between one sorrow after the next sorrow.  She felt more confident that sorrow would remain in the offing than that love would come to rescue her out of her melancholy.

    The reader is by now quite familiar with the sadness, pain, and grief this speaker has suffered in her life and that she continues to suffer these maladies.   For this melancholy speaker to accept the balm of love remains very difficult. Her doubts and fears continue to remain more real to her than these new, most cherished feelings of love and affection.

    Second Quatrain:   Continuing Fear

    Distrusting every light that seemed to gild
    The onward path, and feared to overlean
    A finger even. And, though I have grown serene
    And strong since then, I think that God has willed

    Answering her own question in the negative, the speaker asserts that she preferred to remain skeptical of the hints that seemed to suggest a progression toward the loving relationship.   

    The speaker’s fears continue to prompt her  to hold back her heart because she continued to remains afraid that if she gave way at even a “finger[’s]” length, she would regret the loss so much that she would suffer even more than she already had done.

    Quite uncharacteristically, the speaker admits that since that early time at the very beginning of this love relationship, she has, indeed, “grown serene / And strong.”   Such an admission is difficult for the  personality of this troubled speaker, but she does remain aware that she must somehow come to terms with her evolving growth.

    First Tercet:   Skepticism for Protection

    A still renewable fear … O love, O troth …
    Lest these enclaspèd hands should never hold,
    This mutual kiss drop down between us both

    Still, even though this wary speaker is cognizant of her growth in terms of serenity and strength, she believes that God has instilled in her the ability to remain somewhat skeptical in order to protect herself from certain torture at having been wrong about the relationship.

    This speaker knows that if, “these enclaspèd hands should never hold,” she would be devastated if she had not protected her heart by retaining those doubts.   If the “mutual kiss” should “drop between us both,” this ever-thinking speaker is sure her life would be filled with even more grief and sorrow.

    Second Tercet:  Wrenching Feeling

    As an unowned thing, once the lips being cold.
    And Love, be false! if he, to keep one oath,
    Must lose one joy, by his life’s star foretold.

    The speaker then spreads across the border of the tercets the wrenching feeling that her words are causing her.   This melancholy speaker feels that she must give utterance to these thoughts, but she knows that they will cause pain, even to her belovèd. But if, “Love, be false,” then she simply must acknowledge that possibility for both their sakes.

    The speaker anticipates the likelihood that she might have to “lose one joy” which may already be written in her stars, and not knowing which joy that might be, she must remain watchful that it might be the very love she is striving so mightily to protect.

  • Elizabeth Barrett Browning’s Sonnet 8 “What can I give thee back, O liberal”

    Image: Elizabeth Barrett Browning – Getty Images

    Elizabeth Barrett Browning’s Sonnet 8 “What can I give thee back, O liberal”

    The speaker continues to deny her good fortune as she reveals her gratitude for the attention of her illustrious suitor; she begins to accept her lot but reluctantly.

    Introduction and Text of Sonnet 8 “What can I give thee back, O liberal”

    Sonnet 8 from Elizabeth Barrett Browning’s Sonnets from the Portuguese finds the speaker continuing to doubt and deny her great fortune in attracting such an accomplished and generous suitor.  However, she is slowly beginning to accept the possibility that this amazing man could have affection for her.

    Sonnet 8 “What can I give thee back, O liberal”

    What can I give thee back, O liberal
    And princely giver, who hast brought the gold
    And purple of thine heart, unstained, untold,
    And laid them on the outside of the wall
    For such as I to take or leave withal,
    In unexpected largesse? am I cold,
    Ungrateful, that for these most manifold
    High gifts, I render nothing back at all?
    Not so; not cold,—but very poor instead.
    Ask God who knows. For frequent tears have run
    The colors from my life, and left so dead
    And pale a stuff, it were not fitly done
    To give the same as pillow to thy head.
    Go farther! let it serve to trample on.

    Reading 

    Commentary on Sonnet 8 “What can I give thee back, O liberal”

    The speaker continues to deny her good fortune as she reveals her gratitude for the attention of her illustrious suitor; she begins to accept her lot but reluctantly.

    First Quatrain:  Baffled by Attention

    What can I give thee back, O liberal
    And princely giver, who hast brought the gold
    And purple of thine heart, unstained, untold,
    And laid them on the outside of the wall

    The speaker once again finds herself baffled by the attention she receives from one who is so much above her station in life. He has given her so much, being a “liberal / And princely giver.”  The term “liberal” here means openly generous.

    Her suitor has brought his valuable poetry to her along with his own upper-class qualities and manners. She metaphorically assigns all of those gifts to the status of “gold and purple,” the colors of royalty, and she locates them “outside the wall.”

    The suitor romances her by serenading her under her window, and she is astonished by the good fortune she is experiencing.  She cannot comprehend how one so delicate and lowly positioned as herself can merit the attention she continues to garner from this handsome, accomplished poet.

    Second Quatrain:  Rejecting or Accepting

    For such as I to take or leave withal,
    In unexpected largesse? am I cold,
    Ungrateful, that for these most manifold
    High gifts, I render nothing back at all? 

    The handsome suitor provides the speaker with the choice of taking his affections and attentions or rejecting them, and she is very grateful for all she receives even as she regrets that she has nothing to offer in return.  She declaims: “I render nothing back at all?”  She frames her lack into a question that answers itself, implying that even though she may seem “ungrateful,” nothing could be further from the truth.

    The rhetorical intensity achieved through dramatizing her feelings in a rhetorical question enhances not only the sonnet’s artistry but also adds dimension to those same feelings.  The rhetorical question device magnifies the emotion.  Instead of employing overused expressions along the lines of “definitely” or “very,” the speaker uses the rhetorical question  to fuse the poetic tools into a dramatic expression that fairly explodes with emotion.

    First Tercet:  No Lack of Passion

    Not so; not cold,—but very poor instead.
    Ask God who knows. For frequent tears have run
    The colors from my life, and left so dead

    The speaker, however, does not leave the question open to possible misinterpretation; she then quite starkly answers, “No so; not cold.” She does not lack passion about the gifts her suitor bestows upon her; she is merely “very poor instead.”

    She insists that it is “God who knows” the extent of her poverty as well as the depth of her gratitude. She then admits that through much shedding of tears, she has caused the details of her life to fade as clothing rinsed many times in water would become “pale a stuff.”

    Second Tercet:  Low Self Esteem

    And pale a stuff, it were not fitly done
    To give the same as pillow to thy head.
    Go farther! let it serve to trample on.

    The speaker’s lack of a colorful life, her lowly station, her simplicity of expression have all combined to make her denigrate herself before the higher class suitor with whom she feels compelled to contrast herself.

    She is still not able to reconcile her lack to his plenty, and again she wants to urge him to go from her because she feels her lack is worth so little that it might “serve to trample on.”  Her hopes and dreams she will keep hidden until they can override the reality of her personal lack of experience and life station.

  • Emily Dickinson’s “I had a guinea golden”

    Image: Emily Dickinson – Amherst College – Daguerrotype of the poet at age 17, circa 1847 – likely the only authentic, extant likeness of the poet

    The speaker in Emily Dickinson’s “I had a guinea golden” is expressing melancholy at the loss of a friend, whom she describes metaphorically in terms of three dear objects: a guinea, a robin, and a star.

    Introduction with Text of “I had a guinea golden”

    This fascinating Emily Dickinson poem of loss offers quite a tricky subversion of thought.  The first three stanzas seem to explain the loss of three separate loved ones. 
    Then the final stanza packs a wallop unloading on only one “missing friend,” who has caused the speaker to create this “mournful ditty” with tears in her eyes.

    This poem demonstrates the depth of Dickinson’s education as she employs metaphors of the British coinage system and allusions to Greek mythology, which has been further employed by the science of astronomy to name stars. 

    Not only did Dickinson study widely in many subject areas, she possessed the ability to employ her learning in creative ways to fashion those beautiful flowers, allowing them to grow in her garden of verse.

    I had a guinea golden

    I had a guinea golden –
    I lost it in the sand –
    And tho’ the sum was simple
    And pounds were in the land –
    Still, had it such a value
    Unto my frugal eye –
    That when I could not find it –
    I sat me down to sigh.

    I had a crimson Robin –
    Who sang full many a day
    But when the woods were painted,
    He, too, did fly away –
    Time brought me other Robins –
    Their ballads were the same –
    Still, for my missing Troubador
    I kept the “house at hame.”

    I had a star in heaven –
    One “Pleiad” was its name –
    And when I was not heeding,
    It wandered from the same.
    And tho’ the skies are crowded –
    And all the night ashine –
    I do not care about it –
    Since none of them are mine.

    My story has a moral –
    I have a missing friend –
    “Pleiad” its name, and Robin,
    And guinea in the sand.
    And when this mournful ditty
    Accompanied with tear –
    Shall meet the eye of traitor
    In country far from here –
    Grant that repentance solemn
    May seize upon his mind –
    And he no consolation
    Beneath the sun may find.

    Reading 

    Commentary on “I had a guinea golden”

    Each stanza builds to a magnificent crescendo of outrage that allows the speaker to lavish affection as well as harsh rebuke to the one leaving her in a state of melancholy.

    First Stanza:  The Value of Small Things

    I had a guinea golden –
    I lost it in the sand –
    And tho’ the sum was simple
    And pounds were in the land –
    Still, had it such a value
    Unto my frugal eye –
    That when I could not find it –
    I sat me down to sigh.

    The speaker begins by referring to the coin “guinea,” which was a British coin manufactured with the gold from the African nation of Guinea.  The coin was worth 21 shillings and ceased circulating in 1813.   The speaker maintains the British monetary metaphor by referring also to “pounds” in the fourth line of the poem.

    Metaphorically, the speaker is calling her lost friend a “golden” coin, which she lost “in the sand.”  She then admits that it was a small loss for much more valuable moneys—”pounds”—were all about her.   Nevertheless, to her, because of her frugality, the value of the small coin was huge, and because it was lost to her, she just “sat down to sigh.”

    Second Stanza:  Missing the Music

    I had a crimson Robin –
    Who sang full many a day
    But when the woods were painted,
    He, too, did fly away –
    Time brought me other Robins –
    Their ballads were the same –
    Still, for my missing Troubador
    I kept the “house at hame.”

    The speaker then employs the metaphor of “crimson Robin.”  This time she is likening her friend to the singing robin who “sang full many a day.”  But when the autumn of the year came around, she loses this friend also.

    Just as other moneys were abounding after the loss of a simple guinea, other robins presented themselves to the speaker after she lost her robin.  But even though they sang the same songs as her lost robin, it just was not the same for the speaker.   She continues to mourn the loss of her robin; thus she kept herself harnessed to her house, likely in case her own robin should show up again.

    Third Stanza:  The Mythology of Science

    I had a star in heaven –
    One “Pleiad” was its name –
    And when I was not heeding,
    It wandered from the same.
    And tho’ the skies are crowded –
    And all the night ashine –
    I do not care about it –
    Since none of them are mine.

    The speaker then finds herself once again mourning the loss of a loved one.  This one she labels “Pleiad.”  Pleiad is an allusion to Greek mythology but also a reference to astronomy.  

    In Greek mythology, the seven daughters of Atlas went into hiding up in the sky among the stars to escape being pursued by Orion.  One the seven seems to disappear perhaps out of shame or grief.  

    In the science of astronomy, the constellation known as Taurus features a group of seven stars, but oddly enough only six can be seen, resulting in the same “Lost Pleiad” as exists in the Greek myth.

    Dickinson, who studied widely the subjects of mythology, history, and science thus alludes to the myth of the “Lost Pleiad” to again elucidate the nature of her third lost beloved.   She has now experienced the loss of money, a bird, and now a star–each more precious than the last.

    The speaker loses the star as she was being heedless–not paying attention.  In her negligent state, her star wanders away from her.  Again, although the sky is full of other stars, they just don’t measure up because “none of them are mine.”

    Fourth Stanza:  Admonishing a Traitor

    My story has a moral –
    I have a missing friend –
    “Pleiad” its name, and Robin,
    And guinea in the sand.
    And when this mournful ditty
    Accompanied with tear –
    Shall meet the eye of traitor
    In country far from here –
    Grant that repentance solemn
    May seize upon his mind –
    And he no consolation
    Beneath the sun may find.

    While wildly famous for her riddles, Dickinson often breaks the riddle’s force by actually naming the object described.  In the final stanza, she blatantly confesses that her little story “has a moral.”  She then blurts out, “I have a missing friend.”  

    It is now that the reader understands the loss is not three different loved ones, but only one.  She has thus been describing that “missing friend” using three different metaphoric images.

    Now, however, she has a message for this friend whose description has revealed multiple times how much she misses the friend and laments the loss.   After again rather baldly admitting her sorrow told in “this mournful ditty” and even “[a]ccompanied with tear,” she refers to that missing friend as a “traitor.”

    If this friend who has betrayed her happens to see this “mournful ditty,” she hopes that it will grab that individual’s mind so that the person will experience “repentance solemn.”  Furthermore, she wishes that the friend be unable to find any solace for the individual’s contrition no matter where that friend goes.

  • American Ballads

    Image: Thomas Thornburg, Back Book Cover American Ballads

    American Ballads

    Published by Author House, Bloomington IN, 2009

    Bag Ladies

    Bag ladies are this season wearing
    field-jackets gleaned from K-MART shoppers and
    KEDS cast off by charioteers
    on skateboards fleeing from the cops;
    hooded and rope-cinched at their waists
    (doomed matched pairs shuffling westward).
    vespers et matins in their quest
    they toss and comb the city’s trash,
    each empty can discovered, cash.
    Sometimes drunk they will confess it,
    and sometimes cough the alley retching
    pink spittle in their sad kermess.
    Sometimes we talk (they ask my pardon
    for sifting through these things discarded)
    for better homes and other gardens.

    Other Gardens

    When children, we dreamed
    Of sailing to Baghdad.
    Hoosier gardens teemed
    Like Iram; Kaikobad
    Led Persian cavalry
    Down to an inland sea.

    Those magic minarets
    Are with childhood hidden,
    Our children in the desert
    Killing children.

    Serving the South

    deadended on a siding in Midway, Alabama,
    stand 6.5 miles of RR cars.
    covered in kudzu and time, they stand,
    iron cheeks squaring their gothic mouths;
    they are Southern and Serve the South
    (hub-deep in red clay) this land,
    this ekkuklema of southern drama.
    still, it is Bike Week in Daytona,
    and the Lady is sold in yards from rucksacks
    where a tattooed mama fucks & sucks
    (her name is not Ramona).
    here will come no deus ex machina,
    this American South, this defeated dream.
    drunken, drugged, dolorous in their dementia,
    forbidden by Law to wear their colors,
    these cavaliers race their engines and scream
    where the marble figure in every square
    shielding his eyes as the century turns
    stands hillbilly stubborn and declares.
    heading back north having spent our earnings,
    honeyed and robbed we are fed on hatred
    cold as our dollar they cannot spurn,
    and we are in that confederate.

    For my commentary on this poem, please see my article “Thomas Thornburg’s ‘Serving the South’.”

    Twelve Clerihews and a Sketch

    Poor Eddie Poe
    collapsed in the snow
    and exhaled no more
    in old Baltimore

    Poor Mary Mallon
    wept o’er many a gallon
    of soapsuds, avoiding
    the cops, and typhoiding.

    W. B. Yeats
    believed in the fates,
    but on Sunday
    in Spiritus Mundi.

    . . .

    Koan

    Once in this journey, following the call
    I broke my bones falling
    Now I go hobbled to a distant star
    My shippe a heavy bar
    Friends come asking how we are
    My friends, my friends, we are alone.
    He who would know must break his own bones

    A Ballad of My Grandfather

    My grandfather was a Wobbly, sirs,
    And as such he was banned
    And blackballed from his daily bread
    Across your promised land.

    My grandfather polished metal, sirs,
    And ripped his skilly hands
    Whenever you allowed him to
    Across your promised land.

    My grandfather suffered somewhat, sirs,
    And worked till he could stand
    No more before your wheel; he loafs
    Beneath your promised land.

    My father walked a picket, sirs,
    In nineteen-forty-five,
    His son beside, and with them walked
    His father, man alive.

    That was a bitter solstice, sirs,
    The wind complained like ghosts,
    The cold struck home, the striker stood
    Frozen to their posts.

    The people in the city, sirs,
    Sequestered in their hate,
    Supped in communal kitchens there
    And massed at every gate.

    Consider all such service, sirs,
    Kindred to your time,
    A  long apprenticeship to cast
    Such mettle into rime:

    The pain these fathers weathered, sirs,
    The freedoms you forsook,
    Is polished into pickets here
    And winters in their book.

    to be continued, check back for updates

    Publication status of American Ballads

    Copies of American Ballads are readily available on Amazon and reasonably priced at $10.99, even offered as Prime.  This Amazon page features a commentary by the wife of the poet, who felt that the book deserved further description. 

  • Ron W. G.’s Prose “A Nightmare Comes True”

    The barn my grandfather built

    A Nightmare Comes True

    This is my experience of a recurring nightmare that came true.

    In 1970 I was 16 years old. We lived in a small town in Southeastern Indiana, in a little neighborhood just across the river from town. Our house was on the main road, and we had horses in a barn and pen area on the other side of the neighborhood. To get to the barn, we walked along a path that led past our grandparents’ house. The path led from our driveway, all the way across the neighborhood to the back road.

    On the way to the barn, our grandparents’ house was to the right, up a small hill past a yard with lots of trees and beautiful landscaping with flowers and shrubs.

    Grandpa Plowing the Garden

    On the left side of the path was a huge flower garden with a grape arbor and many shrubs, small trees, and hundreds of flowers that bloomed in spring and summer.

    Our Grandparents Loved Animals

    When we were very little, our grandparents always had ponies and horses, and many other pets and animals. Grandpa used to take us for pony cart rides.

    Picture of grandpa and us on a pony cart ride

    Our grandparents had passed away years ago. From them, we inherited our love for animals.  We usually had a couple of ponies and horses, as well as several dogs. I loved horses and everything about them, so one of my chores was to feed the horses every morning before school. In the winter, that meant that I had to walk along the path across the neighborhood to the barn in the dark. That didn’t bother me at all. I carried a flashlight so I could see, but I wasn’t afraid of the dark. We knew everyone in the neighborhood, and I always felt completely safe there.

    The Nightmare

    One night I dreamed that when I went to the barn to feed the horses, there was a man in the barn. In the dream, as I was giving the horses hay, a man came up behind me. It scared me, and I usually woke up right away. I didn’t think too much about it at the time, but then I started having that dream every night. It started to scare me a lot, so I told my mom about the dreams. I told her that I was afraid to go over to the barn. 

    We had three German Shepherd dogs at the time, and Mom said, “Well, take the dogs with you.” So I started taking the dogs with me every morning. The dogs loved the early morning trek to the barn, and they were always eager to join me. Once I started taking the dogs with me, the dream stopped.

    A few weeks later, I started having the dream again. In one of the dreams, when the man in the barn came at me, I grabbed a pitchfork and stabbed him. That only happened in one of the dreams. In all the other dreams, I just saw a man in the barn, it scared me, and I woke up right away.

    After a few more nights of these dreams, I told mom that I was having that dream again and that I was afraid to go to the barn even though the dogs were with me. Mom said, “Take Randy with you.” Randy, my younger brother, was 14 years old at the time. He wasn’t obsessed with horses like I was, and he wasn’t exactly thrilled that he had to go out in the dark early morning cold, but he went along anyway. He loved the dogs, and he enjoyed seeing how excited they were to go on our morning excursions.

    The Dream Stops for Awhile

    After I started taking the dogs, and my brother with me to feed the horses, the dreams stopped, and all was good for a while.

    Then one night I had the dream again. I didn’t tell Mom or Randy that I had had the dream again. I didn’t know what else could be done, and since I had been having the dream on and off for several weeks and nothing bad had happened, I wasn’t too worried about it.

    That morning as we reached the barn, we noticed that the dogs were excitedly sniffing at the barn doors and running back and forth in front of the doors. I thought that they had probably just caught the scent of an animal, maybe a rabbit or something. I slid open the huge double barn doors, and the dogs immediately ran inside barking and growling. Inside the barn toward the back was the haystack.

    A man jumped up out of the hay and yelled as the dogs were at his feet. I couldn’t tell if the dogs bit him, but they were loudly barking and growling. Randy and I screamed and ran as fast as we could back to our house. The back door of our house faced the south side of the neighborhood and it was closest to the barn. The back door opened directly into the kitchen.

    My horse in back of the barn

    Randy and I ran in through the back door, and we both screamed, at the same time, “There’s a man in the barn!” In the kitchen were our Mom, our older brother Chuck, and our little sister Faye. At this point, I didn’t know if the dogs were still over at the barn, or if they had followed us back home. Our older brother, Chuck, grabbed a baseball bat and said, “Let’s go.” I remember being very impressed that Chuck was so brave.

    The dogs had come home, and they joined us as we returned to the barn. When we got to the barn, the man was gone. We could see where he had been sleeping in the hay, and where he had taken a leak on the floor. I fed the horses and we returned home. Mom said that she had called the sheriff, and he said that it was probably a bum just getting out of the cold. Then I felt sorry for the man. It must have been horrible to wake up with dogs attacking you.

    I Had Told My Family and Girlfriend About the Dreams

    I had told only my family and my girlfriend about those recurring dreams. My girlfriend lived just two houses down the road from our barn, and she loved horses as much as I did.

    After school that day, I was walking over to the barn as my girlfriend was walking up the road. When she got to the little hill which was on the back road just in front of the barn, I said, “There was a man in the barn this morning.” She said, “I just pinched myself to make sure I wasn’t dreaming.”

    The Dream Stops for Good

    I never had that dream again, and after a while, I no longer had to make Randy go with me to feed the horses. I did keep taking the dogs though since they loved going with me, and I enjoyed their company.

    I will admit that even though I wasn’t afraid anymore, I think that I was more alert as to my surroundings after that. I often wonder what might have happened if I had not had those dreams and if I had not told my mom about them.

  • Stephen Vincent Benét’s “The Ballad of William Sycamore”

    Image:  Stephen Vincent Benét

    Stephen Vincent Benét’s “The Ballad of William Sycamore”

    Not strictly a cowboy poem, Benét’s ballad, however, offers the mind-set of an individual close to the land, preferring the rural life to the urban.

    Introduction and Text of “The Ballad of William Sycamore”

    Stephen Vincent Benét’s “The Ballad of William Sycamore” features 19 rimed, stanzas of traditional ballad form. The subject is the rustic life of William Sycamore, narrated by Sycamore himself from just before his birth to after his death.

    The Ballad of William Sycamore

    My father, he was a mountaineer,
    His fist was a knotty hammer;
    He was quick on his feet as a running deer,
    And he spoke with a Yankee stammer.

    My mother, she was merry and brave,
    And so she came to her labor,
    With a tall green fir for her doctor grave
    And a stream for her comforting neighbor.

    And some are wrapped in the linen fine,
    And some like a godling’s scion;
    But I was cradled on twigs of pine
    In the skin of a mountain lion.

    And some remember a white, starched lap
    And a ewer with silver handles;
    But I remember a coonskin cap
    And the smell of bayberry candles.

    The cabin logs, with the bark still rough,
    And my mother who laughed at trifles,
    And the tall, lank visitors, brown as snuff,
    With their long, straight squirrel-rifles.

    I can hear them dance, like a foggy song,
    Through the deepest one of my slumbers,
    The fiddle squeaking the boots along
    And my father calling the numbers.

    The quick feet shaking the puncheon-floor,
    And the fiddle squealing and squealing,
    Till the dried herbs rattled above the door
    And the dust went up to the ceiling.

    There are children lucky from dawn till dusk,
    But never a child so lucky!
    For I cut my teeth on “Money Musk”
    In the Bloody Ground of Kentucky!

    When I grew as tall as the Indian corn,
    My father had little to lend me,
    But he gave me his great, old powder-horn
    And his woodsman’s skill to befriend me.

    With a leather shirt to cover my back,
    And a redskin nose to unravel
    Each forest sign, I carried my pack
    As far as a scout could travel.

    Till I lost my boyhood and found my wife,
    A girl like a Salem clipper!
    A woman straight as a hunting-knife
    With eyes as bright as the Dipper!

    We cleared our camp where the buffalo feed,
    Unheard-of streams were our flagons;
    And I sowed my sons like the apple-seed
    On the trail of the Western wagons.

    They were right, tight boys, never sulky or slow,
    A fruitful, a goodly muster.
    The eldest died at the Alamo.
    The youngest fell with Custer.

    The letter that told it burned my hand.
    Yet we smiled and said, “So be it!”
    But I could not live when they fenced the land,
    For it broke my heart to see it.

    I saddled a red, unbroken colt
    And rode him into the day there;
    And he threw me down like a thunderbolt
    And rolled on me as I lay there.

    The hunter’s whistle hummed in my ear
    As the city-men tried to move me,
    And I died in my boots like a pioneer
    With the whole wide sky above me.

    Now I lie in the heart of the fat, black soil,
    Like the seed of the prairie-thistle;
    It has washed my bones with honey and oil
    And picked them clean as a whistle.

    And my youth returns, like the rains of Spring,
    And my sons, like the wild-geese flying;
    And I lie and hear the meadow-lark sing
    And have much content in my dying.

    Go play with the towns you have built of blocks,
    The towns where you would have bound me!
    I sleep in my earth like a tired fox,
    And my buffalo have found me.

    Reading: 

    Commentary on “The Ballad of William Sycamore”

    Speaking from two unlikely locales, William Sycamore narrates a fascinating tale of a fanciful life.

    First Movement: Rough and Tumble Parents

    The speaker describes his parents as scrappy, rough survivors. His mountaineer father had fists that resembled hammers; he ran as fast as a deer, and had a Yankee accent.  His mother was merry and brave and also quite a tough woman, giving birth to the narrator under a tall green fir with no one to help her but “a stream for her comforting neighbor.”

    While some folks can boast of clean linen fine to swaddle them, Sycamores cradle was a pile of pine twigs and he was wrapped in the skin of a mountain lion. Instead of “a starched lap / And a ewer with silver handles,” he recalls “a coonskin cap / And the smell of bayberry candles.”

    Thus, Sycamore has set the scene of his nativity as rustic and rural, no modern conveniences to spoil him. He idealizes those attributes as he sees them making him strong and capable of surviving in a dangerous world.

    Second Movement: Fun in the Cabin

    Sycamore describes the cabin in which he grew up by focusing on the fun he saw the adults have when they played music and danced. Their visitors were tall, lank, “brown as snuff,” and they brought their long, straight squirrel rifles with them.

    He focuses on the fiddle squealing and the dancing to a foggy song. The raucous partying was so intense that it rattled the herbs hanging over the door and caused a great cloud of dust to rise to the ceiling. He considers himself a lucky child to have experienced such, as well as being able to “cut [his] teeth on ‘Money Musk’ / In the Bloody Ground of Kentucky!”

    Third Movement:  Tall as Indian Corn

    The speaker reports that he grew as tall as the Indian corn, and while his father had little to offer him in things, his father did give him a woodsman skill, which he found helpful. With his homespun gear, a leather shirt on his back, he was able to navigate the woodlands like a profession scout.

    Fourth Movement: A Sturdy Wife

    Reaching adulthood, Sycamore married a sturdy woman, whom he describes as “straight as a hunting-knife / With eyes as bright as the Dipper!” The couple built their home where the buffalo feed, where the streams had no names. They raised sons who were “right, tight boys, never sulky or slow.” 

    The oldest son died at the Alamo, and the youngest died with Custer. While the letters delivering the news of their fallen sons “burned [his] hand,” the grieving parents stoically said, “so be it!” and push ahead with their lives.  What finally broke the speaker’s heart, however, was the fencing of his land, referring the government parceling land to individual owners.

    Fifth Movement:  Gutsy, Self-Reliance

    The speaker still shows his gutsy, self-reliance in his breaking of a colt that bucked him off and rolled over him.  After he recovered, however, he continues to hunt, and while the “city-men tried to move [him],” he refused to be influenced by any city ways. He died “in [his] boots like a pioneer /  With the whole wide sky above [him].”

    Sixth Movement:  Speaking from Beyond

    Speaking from beyond the grave somewhat like a Spoon River resident, only with more verve and no regret, William Sycamore describes his astral environment as a fairly heavenly place.

    He is young again, reminding him of spring rain that returns every year, and his sons are free souls reminding him of wild geese in flight.  He hears the meadow-lark, and he avers that he is very contented in his after-life state.

    Sycamore disdained the city, as most rustics do, so he uses his final stanza to get in one last dig: “Go play with the town you have built of blocks.” He then insists that he would never be bound by a town, but instead he sleeps “in my earth like a tired fox, / And my buffalo have found me.”  In his peaceful, afterlife existence, William Sycamore differs greatly from the typical Spoon River reporter.

    image: Stephen Vincent Benét – Commemorative Stamp 

    Brief Life Sketch of Stephen Vincent Benét

    The works of Stephen Vincent Benét (1898–1943) [1] have influenced many other writers.  Cowboy poet Joel Nelson claims that “The Ballad of William Sycamore” made him fall in love with poetry.  Dee Brown’s title Bury my Heart at Wounded Knee comes directly from the final line of Benét’s poem titled “American Names” [2].

    The book-length poem, John Brown’s Body, won him his first Pulitzer Prize in 1929 and remains the poet’s most famous work. Benét first published “The Ballad of William Sycamore” in the New Republic in 1922.    Benét’s literary talent extended to other forms, including short fiction and novels.  He also excelled in writing screenplays, librettos, an even radio broadcasts.

    Born July 22, 1898, in Bethlehem, Pennsylvania [3] Benét graduated from Yale University in 1919 where instead of a typical thesis, he substituted his third collection of poems.  His father was a military man who appreciated literary studies.  His brother William and his sister Laura both became writers as well.

    Benét’s first novel The Beginning of Wisdom was published in 1921, after which he relocated to France to study at the Sorbonne.  He married the writer Rosemary Carr, and they returned to the USA in 1923, where his writing career blossomed.

    The writer won the O. Henry Story Prize and a Roosevelt Medal, in addition to a second Pulitzer Prize, which was awarded posthumously in 1944 for Western Star.  Just a week before spring of 1943, Benét succumbed to a heart attack in New York City; he was four month shy of his 45th birthday.

    Sources

    [1]  Editors.  “Stephen Vincent Benét.”  Academy of American Poets. Accessed January 13, 2026.

    [2] Darla Sue Dollman.  “Buy My Heart at Wounded Knee and Stephen Vincent Benét.” Wild West History.  October 4, 2013.

    [3] Editors.  “Stephen Vincent Benét.”  Poetry Foundation.  Accessed January 13, 2026.

  • Original Short Fiction:  “Graveyard Whistler’s Fourth Flash Fiction Find” (4) 

    Image: “Whistling past the graveyard” – High Frontier 

    Original Short Fiction:  “Graveyard Whistler’s Fourth Flash Fiction Find” (4) 

    The Graveyard Whistler has become quite enthusiastic about “flash fiction,” offering his fourth installment of the little stories.  Stay tuned for a brief bio of “Belmonte Segwic” (aka “The Graveyard Whistler”) coming soon! 

    Introduction by the Graveyard Whistler 

    Graveyard Whistler at it, again! I continue to find pieces of literature that just blow my mind, so I feel compelled  to share them.  Thus, I am continuing with this series of little narrations that have come to be known as “flash fiction.”  

    There are several online sites that offer this genre of literature, but most have upward of a 500 words or more.  These little gems that I found seldom break 50, including the title!  They exemplify an amazing feat and thus continue to fascinate me!  I think I am in love! 

    And now I am considering a new label for this very, very short narrative.  “Flash fiction” does not seem to fit.  I’ll get back to you on that.  Maybe I could run a contest to get help me rename this genre.  Maybe!  Maybe!  Maybe! 

    A Bit of Background 

    The following set of five that I offer here are reconstituted narratives based on a set I found on a site that no longer exists, “Stone Gulch Literary Arts,” also known as “Stone Gulch Literary Home,” whose owner has given me permission to use the literary offerings he had place on the site.  He lost his interest in literature and will likely become an attorney once he finishes law school and passes the bar exam. 

    Interestingly, “Stoney,” my nickname for him because he refuses to reveal his identity, sports a PhD in American Literature and serves as a full professor in the English department at a midwestern state university. He has given me permission to anything I want with his abandoned works.  

    And I might add, for my purposes, that lit site offers a treasure chest of goodies—from the flash fiction to highly sensual poems to short stories full of dark and dreary twists and turns to airy mystical stuff.  It even delves into some political treatises analysis that is quite fascinating even insightful. 

    Five Flash Fiction Pieces 

    So, I am continuing to share the flash fiction pieces. Here are the new five. Each story contains only five sentences. But each boasts an opening, a conflict, and a conclusion—a feat which I am finding fascinating! 

    Getting Forgetful 

    The unsigned  card arrived two days after Edna’s birthday.  The card was beautiful and very personal.  But it gave no clue as to who had posted it. Edna asked relatives and friends about the card.  Six weeks later, Edna’s mother remembered sending the card. 

    A Country Picnic

    I’ll bring the tea, and Sue can bring the cake. Where should we have our picnic this year? Same as last year, at Eddie’s Country Hide-a-Way. But Eddie sold that home. Yeah, I know; I bought it but kept the name! 

    Poems with Chunks of Ice

    Winton wanted so much to become a famous poet.  At college she became friends with Ashton and Flannory. Flannory became jealous that Ashton liked Winton’s poems. Winton had no interest in Ashton, Flannory, or their poems.  After graduation, Flannory left Ashton for a novelist. 

    Raising the Pane

    Lucette did not understand English well. She hired Johann to help her with her English lessons. Johann asked Lucette for a raise to keep tutoring her. Lucette put up the window. Johann jumped out and never returned. 

    Of Course, You Don’t Know Me

    Candy brought six pies to the reunion banquet at Chicago Town High School. Jackson brought his fiddle and played it for the dancing. Astrid danced and ate pie and conversed with everyone.  Martha finally admitted she did not know Astrid. Astrid finally admitted she had crashed the reunion and had actually graduated from a school in Toledo. 

    A Final Statement from the Graveyard Whistler 

    This installment features five of these flash fiction pieces. I’ll continue to add more later. But I’ll probably explore into other genres before I continue with these. 

    I am procrastinating hugely in writing my dissertation because at this point I am not finding as much information as I had anticipated on the topic of irony.  I am considering changing my focus to a simple ideas of “variety” in the literary world because I am finding that literature, both ancient and modern contemporary, does offer such a wide array of different topics, genres, issues, attitudes, and styles. I could likely revamp a whole new glossary of literary devices if I put my mind to it, and I might just have to do that! 

    My advisor is somewhat dismayed at my dilly-dallying but hey, it’s my life—not hers! 

    Later, Gator!

    Literarily yours,
    Belmonte Segwic
    aka Graveyard Whistler

    🕉

    You are welcome to join me on the following social media:
    TruthSocial, Locals, Gettr, X, Bluesky, Facebook, Pinterest 

    🕉

    Share